freeereport
Industry Report · Finance · 2025

Global Banking Industry: Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) 2025

The FSB 2025 list names 29 global systemically important banks. Bucket changes, capital buffers, TLAC and how G-SIBs are identified.

  • Updated October 1, 2026
  • 4 min read
  • 4 sources
  • Global

Executive Summary

The Financial Stability Board's 2025 list, published on 27 November 2025, names 29 global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), the same banks as in 2024. Bank of America and ICBC moved up from bucket 2 to bucket 3, while Deutsche Bank moved down to bucket 1. The list uses end-2024 data and sets higher capital buffers that apply from 1 January 2027. G-SIBs must also meet TLAC, resolvability and stronger supervisory standards.

Key Numbers

G-SIBs on 2025 list
29[1]
Unchanged from the 2024 list, no additions or removals
Banks changing bucket
3[1]
Two moved up, one moved down in 2025
Buffer effective date
1 Jan 2027[2]
Higher buffers set by the 2025 list apply from this date
High-level indicators
13[2]
Indicators used in the BCBS G-SIB scoring exercise

Charts

Number of G-SIBs by list year

Number of banks on the FSB G-SIB list. The 2023 value follows from the FSB statement that the 2024 list has the same institutions as 2023.

  • 2023
    29
  • 2024
    29
  • 2025
    29

Data Tables

G-SIB bucket changes in the 2025 list

Banks whose bucket changed compared with the 2024 list.

Bank2024 bucket2025 bucket
Bank of America23
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China23
Deutsche Bank21

Overview

Since 2011, the FSB and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) have identified global systemically important banks each year [3]. Banks are placed in buckets that set the extra loss-absorbing capital they must hold [3].

The 2025 list, published on 27 November 2025, includes 29 G-SIBs, the same banks as in 2024 [1][2]. The 2024 list also had 29 banks, unchanged from 2023 [4].

Recent Developments

  • Bank of America and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China moved from bucket 2 to bucket 3, which carries a higher capital requirement [1].
  • Deutsche Bank moved from bucket 2 to bucket 1, which carries a lower capital requirement [1].
  • The FSB said the complexity category was the largest contributor to score movements [2].
  • The next list is due in November 2026 [1].

Policy & Regulation

FSB member authorities apply four sets of requirements to G-SIBs [2]:

  • Higher capital buffers by bucket; buffers from the 2025 list apply from 1 January 2027 [2].
  • The Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) standard, phased in from 1 January 2019 [2].
  • Resolvability requirements, including group-wide resolution planning reviewed in the FSB Resolvability Assessment Process [2].
  • Higher supervisory expectations for risk management, risk data aggregation, governance and internal controls [2].

Methodology

This report uses FSB publications [1][2][3][4]. The 2025 assessment uses end-2024 data and a BCBS methodology agreed in July 2018 [2]. Most banks reported data as of 31 December 2024; banks in India and Japan reported as of 31 March 2025 and Canadian banks as of 31 October 2024 [2]. The BCBS scores banks on 13 high-level indicators [2]. The FSB brings together authorities from 24 countries and jurisdictions [1]. IMF Global Financial Stability Report figures were not verified for this edition and are not included.

Sources

  1. [1]

    FSB publishes 2025 G-SIB list / Financial Stability Board / 2025-11-27 / Accessed October 1, 2026 / View source

  2. [2]

    2025 List of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) / Financial Stability Board / 2025-11-27 / Accessed October 1, 2026 / View source

  3. [3]

    Global Systemically Important Financial Institutions (G-SIFIs) / Financial Stability Board / Accessed October 1, 2026 / View source

  4. [4]

    2024 List of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) / Financial Stability Board / 2024-11-26 / Accessed October 1, 2026 / View source

Figures are reproduced from the publishers above. Calculations marked as our own are derived from these figures. Always check the original source before using a number.